A practice prompt we wrote. No company or candidate report names it, so it carries no company tag.
How to answer
In work the prototype can become the production system. Sierra’s April 2026 post on its AI-native interview for engineering candidates says the Review stage includes a discussion of the path to production. Source 1The AI-native interview (Vijay Iyengar, Arya Asemanfar, Angie Wang)PublisherSierraSource typecompany blog The question asks for your order of repairs, and why.
- How it crossed over. Who started relying on it, and what it touched by then: real data, a real process. If nobody decided it, say so plainly, and say when you told the customer it was now production, with the support you could promise meanwhile.
- The inventory. List the shortcuts you knew about, then rank them by what failure would cost. A defensible order: anything that can silently produce wrong data, then whether you would know it broke, then access and secrets, then anything you cannot recover, then whether someone other than you can run it, then performance and code quality. Do the fixes that take an hour first, wherever they rank: a nightly backup and an alert buy time for the rest.
- What you fixed first. The top one or two, with the reason: “It wrote to their ledger with no , so a retry double-posted.”
- How you fixed it live. A feature freeze, one change at a time, backups before each, a test around the dangerous path before touching it.
- The handover and the habit. Who runs it now, and what you record differently when you build the next prototype.
Say the ranked list out loud before you describe any fix; it shows you knew the shortcuts rather than found them by accident.
The trap is the rewrite: “we threw it away and rebuilt it properly” skips the triage the question asks about, and leaves users on the risky version while you rebuild.
Follow-ups
What the interviewer may ask next, once your first answer is on the table.
- What did you deliberately leave rough, and has it caused a problem since?
- How did you make changes without stopping the people already using it?
- If you had had one week instead of a month, which single fix would you have made, and what would you have told the customer about the rest?
Where answers go wrong
- Answers “we rewrote it properly”, which skips the judgment the question asks for, or starts with code cleanup and test coverage while the risk of silent data loss sits untouched.
- Treats production as something that happened to them, blaming the customer for using the prototype, instead of noticing and taking ownership of it.
Answer this in two minutes
Write the answer you would say out loud. The clock starts with your first word.
Illustrative answer about a fictional project
At an appliance manufacturer, I built a prototype for the warranty team. It read claim emails from service dealers, pulled out the model, the serial number and the fault, and created the claim in their claims system through its API.